- Latest news and media
- Legal case summaries
- Industry Update
- Latest Industry Update
- Industry Update April-May 2018
- Past Industry Updates
- Industry update - November-December 2016
- Industry Update July - August 2016
- Industry Update July - August 2017
- Industry Update March - April 2016
- Message from the Director
- Court summary - New cases
- Court summary - Finalised matters
- Summary of recent Right of Entry Permit activity
- FWBC to assess enterprise agreements for code compliance
- Drug and Alcohol testing requirements under the Building Code 2013
- Contact FWO for matters related to wages and entitlements
- Industry Update March - April 2017
- Industry Update May - June 2016
- Industry Update November - December 2017
- Industry Update September - October 2016
- Industry Update September - October 2017
- Message from the Acting Commissioner
- Annual report - significant outcomes by the ABCC in 2016-17
- Court summary – finalised matters
- Court summary – new matters
- Summary of recent right of entry permit activity
- Streamlined process for resubmission of enterprise agreements
- The first year of the 2016 Code
- Wages and Entitlements
- Industry Update - January - February 2016
- Industry Update 18 December 2015
- Industry Update 27 November 2015
- Industry Update 6th August 2015
- Message from the Director
- CFMEU may be banned from paying its officials’ fines
- FWBC puts Tier One contractor before Federal Court
- CFMEU official allegedly tells building contractor “you’re on the top of our hit list” & threatens “500 blokes” will go onsite
- CFMEU official allegedly threatens ‘war’ and another ‘Kane’ situation
- Q & A with FWBC
- Three CFMEU officials’ permit applications refused
- Industry Update 13th July 2015
- Industry Update 18th March 2015
- Industry Update 5th March 2015
- Message from the Director
- Come on get Appy
- Compulsory 2013 Building Code audits starting
- 72 CFMEU officials before the courts
- Building and construction activity update
- Union officials must obey safety rules
- Court penalises CFMEU and officials $205,100
- Freedom of Association - Know Your Rights
- CFMEU’s Luke Collier added to No Permit List
- Courts wrap up
- Industry Update November 2014
- Industry Update October 2014
- Industry Update September 2014
- Industry Update August 2014
- Industry Update July 2014
- Industry Update June 2014
- Industry Update April 2014
- Industry Update March 2014
- E-Alert - Melbourne rally on 18 February 2014
- Industry Update - January-February 2017
- Industry Update - May - June 2017
- Industry Update February 2014
- Industry Update December 2013
- Industry Update November 2013
- Industry Update October 2013
- Industry Update June 2013
- Acting Director's message
- Vic CFMEU & officials incur $115k penalty
- FWBC conducts site visits following Melbourne Stop Work Rally
- Supreme Court finds CFMEU guilty of contempt in Grocon case
- $2m in unpaid wages & entitlements in construction workers' pockets
- The Building Code - what does it mean for you?
- Queensland's Office of State Revenue targets construction industry employers
- E-Alert - Melbourne Rally on 30 April 2013
- Industry Update April 2013
- New leadership at FWBC - Acting Director's message
- Know your worth campaign in full swing
- Do you employ apprentices? Tell us more
- Unpaid employee entitlements? Where to go for help
- Construction industry loses fewer days to strikes
- FWO to tackle exploitation of workers on 457 visas
- Free business apps now available
- Hot off the press - brochure for employees
- Industry Update January 2013
- Chief executive's message - welcome back to work
- New Building Code announced
- New program in SA to reduce exploitation of 457 visa workers
- Up to 13 per cent of independent contractors misclassified - Independent research report
- FWBC alleges CFMEU WA Secretary coerced building company not to host FWBC presentation
- Update on CFMEU-Grocon dispute proceedings in Vic
- Penalties for breaches of workplace relations law rise by 54.5 per cent
- Happy new year for construction workers - $80,000 in recent recoveries
- Serious penalties for misleading FWBC
- New FWBC guidance notes to promote openness
- Industry Update March 2013
- Do you know your worth? Chief Executive's message
- Knowyourworth.gov.au – the one-stop-shop for apprentices
- Hiring apprentices - what you need to know
- Quick guide to pickets and blockades
- FWBC audit campaign to assess 400 employers
- Don't be caught on the hop! Easter public holidays
- Court dismisses appeal
- Industry Update December 2012
- Industry Update November 2012
- What’s new at FWBC? Chief Executive’s message
- Translated FWBC video and brochures released
- Model national WHS Act – when and where does it apply?
- Q&A with FWBC’s Chief Counsel – Brian Corney
- Compensation and penalty payments secured for head contractor and subbies in Qld
- Things heating up on your building site? Call FWBC
- Follow FWBC on Twitter
- Leigh Johns sets the record straight on recovery of wages and entitlements
- Small business? ASIC wants to hear from you
- Enforceable Undertakings – another regulatory option available to FWBC
- FWBC’s first Annual Report tabled in Parliament
- Industry Update October 2012
- The new FWBC Industry Update is here
- FWBC holds unions and representatives to account in Victoria
- Targeted industrial campaigns cost CFMEU and McDonald $250,000
- Understanding your workplace rights is as easy as checking a box
- Side deals – not worth the paper they’re written on
- FWBC promotes rights of Defence Reservists
- Fair Work Building Industry Inspectors – coming to Rockhampton and Wollongong this month
- Industry Update August 2013
- Message from FWBC Director Val Gostencnik
- End of Financial Year Legal Wrap Up
- Court orders unions to pay $65k penalty for QLD strikes
- FWBC report finds misunderstanding most common reason for underpayments
- Termination of employment under the microscope in NSW
- QLD audit serves as reminder that EBA side deals can be costly
- New court cases in QLD and SA
- FWBC releases Agency Multicultural Plan
- Latest Industry Update
- Media contacts
FWBC puts major contractor before Federal Court13 July 2015
Director of Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v ADCO Constructions & Ors
Allegations as outlined in Fair Work Building & Construction’s (FWBC) statement of claim, these may vary over the course of the proceeding.
From 2006 to mid October 2012, a crane company regularly carried out crane services work for ADCO on ADCO construction sites. Crane services work carried out for ADCO provided approximately one third of the crane company’s income. ADCO would book the crane company in advance and at the time of the booking would provide the crane company with an estimate of the likely duration of the crane services required.
1. The Bond University Project, Bond University Abedian School of Architecture, 14 University Drive Robina
2. Pindara Hospital Project, Allchurch Ave, Benowa
3. The Robina Project, Robina Town Shopping Centre, Robina
12 & 13 October 2012
1. FWBC alleges that on 12 October ADCO contract administrator, Michael Duckett, telephoned the Director of the crane company and said “We can’t tell you to get an EBA, but we have strongly been urged to use nominated contractors or some one with a bona fide EBA,” and “we are encouraged to use recognised EBA’s”.
2. FWBC alleges that during the morning of 12 October, CFMEU officials were present on site and that an ADCO foreman told one of the crane company’s crane operators who was performing work on the project “The unions are here, close down the crane and just go and have lunch or a smoko break”.
3. Just before 9am, FWBC alleges that the foreman told the same crane operator “There is another crane company coming in and the [the crane company] won’t be used on site anymore”.
4. When the crane operator asked what he had done wrong, the foreman allegedly responded “It’s nothing to do with you”.
5. FWBC alleges that on 13 October ADCO foreman Gregg Radburn asked the crane company’s operations manager to remove the crane company’s crane from the Bond University project.
6. When the operations manager asked Mr Radburn why, Mr Radburn allegedly responded “Well you know what’s been happening. We can’t have you guys here anymore for that reason”.
20 October 2012
7. FWBC alleges that the crane company’s Sole Director and his wife had a conversation with ADCO site manager Richard Tanner at the Bond University project and that during this conversation Mr Tanner said to the Director that he should take his crane home becase “we [the site] have been instructed by the office to use another company,” and it was out of his hands.
8. Mr Tanner allegedly confirmed that there had been no safety breach and that he was unhappy that the crane company had been removed from the site.
27 October 2012
9. The crane company Director and his wife met with ADCO QLD manager Simon Hawkins at ADCO’s office.
10. During the meeting, FWBC alleges that Mr Hawkins stated that ADCO had signed a ‘union EBA’ to assist ADCO in moving from the ‘Tier 2’ type work they were performing to ‘Tier 1’ type work, that under the ‘union EBA’ ADCO could only utilise companies with union or ‘bona fide’ EBAs and that the crane company would need to sign a union EBA to continue working for ADCO.
Late October 2012
11. During a telephone conversation with Mr Hawkins, the crane company’s Director’s wife stated that she did not understand why the crane company was being penalised, to which FWBC alleges that Mr Hawkins responded “It would be advisable for you to get a union EBA and we can re-engage you.”
12. The director’s wife advised that they did have an Enterprise Agreement to which the Mr Hawkins allegedly responded that it was not a union agreement and not a ‘bona fide’ agreement.
13. The crane company did not complete any work on the Bond University project after 12 October 2012. FWBC alleges that the removal of the crane company from the project caused loss and damage to the crane company in that its income was reduced by the amount of between approximately $390,000 and $780,000.
3 & 14 May 2013
14. FWBC alleges that on 3 May an employee for ADCO telephoned the crane company Director seeking rates for installing site sheds at the Pindara Hospital project and a representative emailed details of the applicable dates to the ADCO employee.
15. FWBC alleges that on 14 May at the Pindara Hospital project, the project site manager said to the crane company Director “I was instructed to hire Gold Coast Cranes and had booked them to install site sheds on 16 May 2013.” “Perhaps [the crane company’s] rates were not sharp enough”.
16. The Director asked “Is this a union site?” to which the site manager allegedly responded “Yes the union will be watching what goes on here very closely”.
17. The site manager then allegedly asked “Why don’t you have a union EBA?” to which the Director responded “No, they wouldn’t consider us as a company to have a union EBA with, especially seeing how only 20% of our work is carried out on union sites”.
18. FWBC alleges that the crane company was not engaged at the Pindara Hospital project because employees of the crane company were not covered by an Enterprise Agreement which covered the CFMEU and that the crane company suffered loss and damage as a result of being excluded from consideration for that work.
5 & 6 July 2013
19. FWBC alleges that on 5 July, Mr Tanner, booked the crane company to carry out crane services work at the Robina project, commencing 8 July.
20. FWBC alleges that on 6 July, Mr Tanner telephoned the Director of the crane company and stated that he was cancelling the job due to a meeting he had with a union delegate the day before who told him that if the union saw the crane company’s cranes on site they would shut the Robina project down.
21. FWBC alleges that the site manager cancelled the engagement of the crane company on the Robina project because employees of the crane company were not covered by an Enterprise Agreement which covered the CFMEU and that the crane company suffered loss and damage as a result of having the work cancelled and also by losing the opportunity to perform additional work on the site.
22. FWBC alleges that ADCO unlawfully discriminated against the crane company on each of the projects contrary to section 354(1) of the Fair Work Act.
23. The maximum penalties available to the court in this case are $10,200 for an individual and $51,000 for a corporation.Media Backgrounder - FWBC puts major contractor before federal court.pdf