Skip to navigation
Skip to content
Office of the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner
Contact
|
Enquire
|
Subscribe
Search
Print
RSS
smaller
larger
Home
>
Media and news centre
>
Latest news and media
Your legal rights and responsibilities
Right of entry for permit holders
Union membership - your right to free choice
Unlawful pressure and coercion prohibited
Unlawful industrial action (e.g. strikes)
Strike Pay
Occupational health and safety
Wages and Entitlements
Building and Construction General On-site Award 2010
Independent contractors
Insolvency and phoenix activities
Running a successful business
How to win Government work - National Code
Which Guidelines apply?
About the National Code and Guidelines
When the National Code applies
Becoming National Code Compliant
Monitoring the National Code
Breaches and sanctions
Publications and Other Resources
Fact sheets
Rights and responsibilities
The National Code and Guidelines
Independent contractors
Reforming the industry
Issues in focus
Legal action and information
Legislation
Notifications to the ABCC
Section 67 reports
Delegations and appointments
Guidance notes
Court cases
Taskforce cases
Interventions and submissions
Compliance powers
ABCC compulsory examination power FAQs
Media and news centre
Latest news and media
Newsletters
Performance and reports
Performance snapshots
Investigations
National Code
Court cases
Reports
Use of compliance powers
Sham Contracting Inquiry Report
Allocation of resources
Annual reports
Working at the ABCC
Opportunities
Work Environment
Working Together
Employee Benefits
Your Development
Frequently Asked Questions
About us
Statement of Strategic Intent 2011-2014
Role
Service
Our history
Leadership and structure
Leigh Johns
Freedom of Information
Information Publication Scheme
Disclosure Log
Operational information
Optional information
Accountability
Client satisfaction survey
Statement of legal expenditure
Contract listing
File listing
People and leadership statement
Reconciliation action plan
Workplace diversity plan
Occupational health and safety
Requesting a review
Current campaigns
Concreting and Finishing Trades Audits
Sham Contracting Inquiry
Lukies v Doyle & CFMEU
VIC
, Backgrounder
Release date:
30 June 2010
Background
Allegations outlined in the ABCC’s statement of claim
Becon Constructions was the head contractor on the Woolworths supermarket complex at 53 Princes Highway, Beaconsfield, Victoria
The Federal entry permit of CFMEU official Fergal Doyle expired on 10 February 2009.
Mr Doyle applied to the Industrial Registrar for a new permit on 28 May 2009 and amended his application on 16 June 2009.
The Industrial Registrar issued Mr Doyle with a permit on 17 June 2009.
At 8am on 22 May 2009, Mr Doyle attended the Woolworths site. The site supervisor told Mr Doyle that he was not entitled to enter because he had not followed the right of entry protocols.
Mr Doyle told the site supervisor that Becon’s right of entry protocols were wrong and entered the site.
Mr Doyle left the site a few minutes later and returned at 8.10am to present the site supervisor with a notice of suspected contravention of the
Victorian Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic)
(OHS Act).
The site supervisor asked Mr Doyle to present his entry permit, to which Mr Doyle replied
“I don’t have to show you my permit”.
Mr Doyle then flashed what looked to be a badge at the site supervisor and again entered the site to identify alleged contraventions of the OHS law.
Alleged contraventions
The ABCC alleges that Mr Doyle had a right to enter the Woolworths site under s87 of the OHS Act but did not hold a permit to enter the site under s15 of the
Workplace Relations Act 1996
(WR Act).
The ABCC alleges that Mr Doyle and the CFMEU contravened:
s756 of the WR Act because Mr Doyle did not hold a permit required for OHS entry and
s768 of the WR Act because Mr Doyle misrepresented his right to enter the site.
ABCC Prosecution
The ABCC filed a statement of claim in the Federal Magistrates Court at Melbourne on 11 June 2010.
Mediation will be conducted on a date advised by the court.
Penalties
The maximum penalties for a contravention of the WR Act are $6600 for an individual and $33,000 for an organisation.
Download
Print friendly version
- 44KB
Related case
Lukies v Doyle & CFMEU