Skip to navigation
Skip to content
Office of the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner
Contact
|
Enquire
|
Subscribe
Search
Print
RSS
smaller
larger
Home
>
Media and news centre
>
Latest news and media
Your legal rights and responsibilities
Right of entry for permit holders
Union membership - your right to free choice
Unlawful pressure and coercion prohibited
Unlawful industrial action (e.g. strikes)
Strike Pay
Occupational health and safety
Wages and Entitlements
Building and Construction General On-site Award 2010
Independent contractors
Insolvency and phoenix activities
Running a successful business
How to win Government work - National Code
Which Guidelines apply?
About the National Code and Guidelines
When the National Code applies
Becoming National Code Compliant
Monitoring the National Code
Breaches and sanctions
Publications and Other Resources
Fact sheets
Rights and responsibilities
The National Code and Guidelines
Independent contractors
Reforming the industry
Issues in focus
Legal action and information
Legislation
Notifications to the ABCC
Section 67 reports
Delegations and appointments
Guidance notes
Court cases
Taskforce cases
Interventions and submissions
Compliance powers
ABCC compulsory examination power FAQs
Media and news centre
Latest news and media
Newsletters
Performance and reports
Performance snapshots
Investigations
National Code
Court cases
Reports
Use of compliance powers
Sham Contracting Inquiry Report
Allocation of resources
Annual reports
Working at the ABCC
Opportunities
Work Environment
Working Together
Employee Benefits
Your Development
Frequently Asked Questions
About us
Statement of Strategic Intent 2011-2014
Role
Service
Our history
Leadership and structure
Leigh Johns
Freedom of Information
Information Publication Scheme
Disclosure Log
Operational information
Optional information
Accountability
Client satisfaction survey
Statement of legal expenditure
Contract listing
File listing
People and leadership statement
Reconciliation action plan
Workplace diversity plan
Occupational health and safety
Requesting a review
Current campaigns
Concreting and Finishing Trades Audits
Sham Contracting Inquiry
Lovewell v BLF and Pearson
QLD
, Backgrounder
Release date:
11 June 2010
Allegations outlined in the ABCC’s statement of claim
Stockwell Design and Construction Pty Ltd (SDC) was the principal contractor engaged to construct stage one of ‘River Point Apartments’ (the project) at 55 Forbes Street, West End, Queensland.
On Friday 5 June 2009 SDC had scheduled a concrete pour for the project.
During that morning a concrete pump was set up in the driveway, and the first of the concrete trucks backed up to discharge concrete into the pump. A line of concrete trucks was parked along Forbes Street, waiting to discharge their loads of concrete into the pump.
At about 11.30am BLF organiser Kane Pearson arrived and parked his car immediately behind the first concrete truck.
The first truck could not leave the pump as a result of the obstruction caused by this vehicle. The concrete pour was disrupted as waiting trucks were unable to access the pump.
A traffic controller engaged by SDC approached Mr Pearson in his vehicle and advised him that he was stopped in a no-park zone.
Mr Pearson got out of the car and walked towards the concrete pump operator. He refused three more requests to remove his vehicle.
Mr Pearson approached the concrete pump operator and told him to stop working.
Following this exchange Mr Pearson met with the SDC quality assurance manager, and claimed he would not remove his car as he believed the concrete pour would continue into the night.
The quality assurance manager told Mr Pearson that if he did not remove the vehicle it would be towed away.
Mr Pearson returned to his vehicle, and stood by the vehicle and blocked attempts to tow it out of the way.
Some time later the police arrived. Mr Pearson acceded to the police requests to remove his car.
The concrete pour was cancelled as it could no longer be completed that day.
Alleged contraventions
The ABCC alleges that on Friday 5 June 2009 the BLF and Mr Pearson breached s.767 (1) of the
Workplace Relations Act 1996
(WR Act) by intentionally hindering or obstructing people working on the site, or otherwise acting improperly while exercising rights as a permit holder.
ABCC Prosecution
The ABCC filed a statement of claim in the Federal Magistrates Court at Brisbane on 25 May 2010. 16. A first directions hearing is scheduled on 15 July 2010.
Penalties
The maximum penalties for a contravention of the WR Act are $6600 for an individual and $33,000 for an organisation.
Download
Print friendly version
- 32KB
Related case
Lovewell v BLF and Pearson