Skip to navigation
Skip to content
Office of the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner
Contact
|
Enquire
|
Subscribe
Search
Print
RSS
smaller
larger
Home
>
Media and news centre
>
Latest news and media
Your legal rights and responsibilities
Right of entry for permit holders
Union membership - your right to free choice
Unlawful pressure and coercion prohibited
Unlawful industrial action (e.g. strikes)
Strike Pay
Occupational health and safety
Wages and Entitlements
Building and Construction General On-site Award 2010
Independent contractors
Insolvency and phoenix activities
Running a successful business
How to win Government work - National Code
Which Guidelines apply?
About the National Code and Guidelines
When the National Code applies
Becoming National Code Compliant
Monitoring the National Code
Breaches and sanctions
Publications and Other Resources
Fact sheets
Rights and responsibilities
The National Code and Guidelines
Independent contractors
Reforming the industry
Issues in focus
Legal action and information
Legislation
Notifications to the ABCC
Section 67 reports
Delegations and appointments
Guidance notes
Court cases
Taskforce cases
Interventions and submissions
Compliance powers
ABCC compulsory examination power FAQs
Media and news centre
Latest news and media
Newsletters
Performance and reports
Performance snapshots
Investigations
National Code
Court cases
Reports
Use of compliance powers
Sham Contracting Inquiry Report
Allocation of resources
Annual reports
Working at the ABCC
Opportunities
Work Environment
Working Together
Employee Benefits
Your Development
Frequently Asked Questions
About us
Statement of Strategic Intent 2011-2014
Role
Service
Our history
Leadership and structure
Leigh Johns
Freedom of Information
Information Publication Scheme
Disclosure Log
Operational information
Optional information
Accountability
Client satisfaction survey
Statement of legal expenditure
Contract listing
File listing
People and leadership statement
Reconciliation action plan
Workplace diversity plan
Occupational health and safety
Requesting a review
Current campaigns
Concreting and Finishing Trades Audits
Sham Contracting Inquiry
Alfred v Quirk
NSW
, Backgrounder
Release date:
24 April 2008
ABCC application
On 15 April 2008 the ABCC applied to the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (AIRC) in Sydney to have CFMEU official Andrew Quirk’s permit revoked.
The application is made under section 770 of the
Workplace Relations Act 1996
(WR Act) for alleged abuse of Part 15 of the WR Act, in breach of section 770 (1) of the WR Act.
Part 15 entitles permit holders to enter sites to represent their members in the workplace, hold discussions with potential members and investigate suspected breaches of industrial laws, industrial instruments and OHS laws.
Mr Quirk currently holds a Federal right of entry permit.
A five-day hearing is scheduled for 4 August 2008.
The grounds for the ABCC’s application are outlined below.
Failure to give minimum 24 hours notice
The ABCC alleges that on 2 October 2007, Mr Quirk provided Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd with notice via fax that he intended to visit a worksite at 284 Castle Hill Road, Castle Hill in NSW on a date including 3 October 2007 to hold discussions with employees.
Mr Quirk is alleged to have entered the site at around 7.50am on 3 October 2007, earlier than the minimum 24 hours notice required under section 763 of the WR Act.
Failure to hold discussions with employees – using right of entry to put up posters
The ABCC alleges that Mr Quirk did not hold discussions with employees on 3 October 2007 as he had indicated in his notice, and that instead he put up posters which promoted union membership.
Failure to show permit on request
Mr Quirk personally delivered an entry notice when he arrived at the site at 7.50am on 3 October 2007 stating that he intended to visit the site on a date including 4 October 2007 for the purpose of holding discussions with employees.
When he arrived at the site on 4 October 2007, the ABCC alleges that he failed to produce his permit when requested to do so by Hansen Yuncken’s site manager.
Failure to hold discussions with employees in a particular part of the site premises
The ABCC alleges that when Mr Quirk visited the site at 10.35 am on 4 October 2007, he failed to accede to site management’s request that discussions be held in a designated car park area.
Aggressive and abusive conduct towards employees
Mr Quirk is alleged to have acted aggressively and abusively towards employees on 3 and 4 October 2007. This conduct included yelling and swearing at them.
Download
Print friendly version
- 29KB
Related case
Alfred v Quirk