CRITERIA FOR [AUDIT/INSPECTION] SELECTION
Project Name: [INSERT PROJECT NAME]
Type of Activity: [AUDIT/INSPECTION]
|
No. |
Factor for consideration |
Relevant |
|
1. |
Pre-condition for Audit Selection:
- authorised by CMG or decision of Director National Code
- if privately funded project – the Principal Contractor has been assessed as routinely undertaking Australian Government funded projects
|
Yes/No
|
|
2. |
Contractor(s) of Interest:
- based on previously reported compliance activity, to identify whether there has been a change in behaviours/attitudes from Principal Contractor or Subcontractors
|
Yes/No |
|
3. |
Funding Entity of Interest
- based on previously reported compliance activity, to identify whether there has been a change in behaviours/attitudes
|
Yes/No |
|
4. |
Geographical Area of Interest:
- behaviours known to occur in project location that require assessment or viewed as an increased risk of non-compliance
|
Yes/No |
|
5. |
Size of the project
- variety of trades and contractors on site
- significant financial investment involved in project
|
Yes/No |
|
6. |
Referral from Code Monitoring Group
- compliance activity at the request of the CMG
|
Yes/No |
|
7. |
ABCC aware of issues as a result of calls to the advice line or industry concerns
- the project that has been brought to the attention of the ABCC from industry, calls to the 1800 number, etc.
- a complaint made to the ABCC from a third party
|
Yes/No |
|
8. |
Request from agency, Minister’s office, Building Industry Branch, etc
- concerns raised by government departments, a minister of the crown, or from information provided by the Building Industry Branch of DEEWR
|
Yes/No |
|
9. |
Result of prior site visit/Inspection
- behaviours/attitudes or concerns that have come to the attention of the ABCC from previous compliance activity on this site
|
Yes/No |
Summary of reason(s):
[INSERT ADDITIONAL REASON/S FOR CODE ACTIVITY]
Investigator/s: [INSERT NAMES OF INVESTIGATORS UNDERTAKING ACTIVITY]
Dated: [INSERT DATE]
Team Leader: [INSERT TL]